The Gwynedd Child Practice Review into paedophile headteacher Neil
Foden, first due in early Spring, then late Spring, then September has
been delayed yet again - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp98739vz49o
‘Our Bravery Brought Justice' review led by Jan Pickles, appears to have been usurped by the North Wales Safeguarding Board, which released a statement on its website -
The North Wales Safeguarding Board have made the decision to delay the
publication of the Gwynedd Child Practice Review this month as it
considers its legal obligations and information sharing further. https://www.northwalessafeguardingboard.wales/gwynedd-child-practice-review/
The NWSB is made up of senior officers from various organisations including local councils, North Wales Police, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board and the Probation service. https://www.northwalessafeguardingboard.wales/nwsab-members/
Cyngor Gwynedd's Corporate Director and their Head of Adults SS sit on the board.
There is considerable anger with the delay and, for many, it shows little thought for the survivors and their families, more an exercise in protecting reputations?
Class actions against the council... In other news, the Neil Foden case is still deemed a risk to the council by Gwynedd's Governance and Audit committee held on the 11th September. Article 4 was also highlighted as a risk but no mention of Canolfan Brynffynnon. Is that case also considered a risk?
Gwynedd's head of Finance also presented the draft accounts to the committee. They show money in reserves to be £592 million and usable reserves of £137 million...
Governance and Audit is the most important committee of a council and it
is a surprise that cyngor Gwynedd do not webcast the meeting. The
meetings, held over Zoom, are recorded but not available for later viewing by councillors
nor the public. Not one member asked about the turmoil within
the children's SS department, with senior officers still 'absent from work'.
Due to the make up of the G&A committee, not all members may be privy to the disclosures to councillors so it was disappointing that the Care Scrutiny committee, held on the 25th September, did not ask the interim head of children services, Aled Gibbard, if services were being affected. Hasn't the director of SS raised concerns..?
The agenda pack and SS Annual Complaints Handling reports can be found here - https://democracy.gwynedd.llyw.cymru//documents/g5530/Public%20reports%20pack%2025th-Sep-2025%2010.00%20Care%20Scrutiny%20Committee.pdf?T=10
The report mirrors last years report, presented by the senior safeguarding officer, Dafydd Paul. It gives little information on the nature of the complaints and, as before, tries to divert attention by attacking vexatious customers. A reminder that the way senior officers report is not always accurate...
The Article 4 directive was passed at the Cabinet meeting of cyngor Gwynedd council on the 16th July, 2024. Two members were absent from this important meeting. Apologies were received from the deputy leader of the council, Nia Jeffreys and the cabinet member for housing, Craig ab Iago.
The meeting was webcast and can be found here - https://gwynedd.public-i.tv/core/portal/webcast_interactive/895758 As often happens, the translated feed is not yet working...
The Education and Economy Scrutiny Committee met on Thursday, 18th July, 2024. Four councillors did not turn up and a co-opted member was also absent.
Olaf Cai Larsen was elected as the new chair. A vice chair was not elected as no-one wanted the position. One councillor was proposed but he point blank refused and so the matter was deferred until the next meeting.
Overview and scrutiny is important in holding Council's policy makers to account and scrutiny committees are fundamental to the
functioning of a healthy democracy. Some councillors have raised concerns that there is no proper scrutiny in Gwynedd and one has even compared it to a 'children's parliament'.
The chair and vice chair of scrutiny committees are allowed access to the Scrutiny Forum. The forum is where the real power lies and determines what is and what is not to be scrutinised at the committees. This forum should be open to the public to ensure propriety.
First up on the agenda was the GwE Annual Report 2023-2024, presented by its
managing director, Arwyn Thomas. GwE is to come to an end in March, 2025
and this will be its last report in its present form. GwE is a school
improvement service for the whole of North Wales but this year their
meetings have focussed more on job losses than any school improvements.
GwE
never really recovered from the 'hotdesking' and inflated travel
expenses scandal that came to light in 2020. It has never been explained
why the former CEO did not action when the council's internal audit
flagged - "To this end, Internal Audit cannot provide assurance that value for
money has been taken into account when changing work locations." https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-53661995
Next up was the Middle Tier Review. This report comes about in part because - Recent
publications including Estyn reports, PISA and the personalised
assessments national report, have identified a need to improve the
quality of learning and outcomes within and across schools, and the
consistency of this across Wales for ALL learners...
The report appears to lay the blame for this on poverty which does not
explain those children who are failing whose parents are not in
poverty.
The report goes on to ask - How well are we doing? How do we know? How can we improve? To
achieve this, school leaders and practitioners should work in
partnership with each other and their LA within an open, trusting
environment. So school leaders, practioners and the culture is the problem - not poverty.
Schools
in Gwynedd have suffered from many issues over the years from bullying, harassment and assault. The problems have not been dealt with and the
Neil Foden case only confirms that pupils (and teachers) are not safe...
A reminder that the Education and Economy Scrutiny Committee failed to hold Neil Foden to account after the school meals debacle and also took no action when the video appearing to show Foden grabbing a pupil by the scruff of the neck appeared online.
A report, authored by Llion Williams and titled Safeguarding Arrangements in Schools was presented. The report can be found in the meetings agenda pack here - https://democracy.gwynedd.llyw.cymru//documents/g5168/Public%20reports%20pack%2018th-Jul-2024%2010.30%20Education%20and%20Economy%20Scrutiny%20Committee.pdf?T=10
As
is to be expected after the Foden case arrangements have been
updated. But they appear to focus on safeguarding children from their
parents and it appears that little has been done to advise what happens
if a senior teacher and/or the designated officer responsible for safeguarding is the one being
abusive.
One councillor pointed out that the school's last Estyn
report stated that safeguarding procedures were robust - when they were
obviously not. Did Neil Foden assist Estyn in this report? To an outsider, Foden was able to abuse with
impunity and there is nothing in this report that suggests those in a
position of authority will not be able to abuse again.
The BBC did report on this meeting but its focus was on matters relating to Foden - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cl4ym5kl85eo The council's current head of education, Gwern ap Rhisiart, told the
education and economy scrutiny committee that safeguarding was a
"priority" for the department.
But Sharon Roberts, representing Arfon's parents and governors on the committee was more critical - "Accept how little confidence there is out there among parents I speak to, everyone has been shocked by what has happened."
Gwynedd and Eryri Sustainable Visitor Economy Plan 2035 was discussed. Cllr Gwynfor Owenmentioned
that the national park agency do not engage with the county council and
a plea was made to consult with councillors.
It was perceived that the
report deals with growth rather than a sustainable visitor economy. The
officer explained that they wanted to extend the tourist season rather than the peak in summer. There was little data to the impact on local jobs and the
the language.
The committee complained of the negative effects of tourism and
that too many people were visiting the area, causing traffic jams and that locals were not able to get to the beach. Seasonal jobs were not
great for those with families and mortgages and that all year round jobs were needed for peoples security. It was mentioned that many businesses were reliant on children...
This led to a trip down memory lane for some who talked of their own childhood experiences working for local businesses. It was pointed out that laws have since been introduced because of the exploitation of children by bosses...
In stark contrast to the Cabinet passing Article 4, one councillor talked of second homes bringing benefits to the local economy and called for a debate to dispel myths on the issue. He contended that these homes relied on local traders, such as plumbers and electricians who in the main spoke the language and that it was a win win.
Many agreed that more research was needed and one commented that the report goes in every direction but the right direction. Councillors were not happy with the report but they voted to pass it anyway...
