A reminder that this investigation was initiated by the Education and Economy Scrutiny committee in early 2025, yet makes no mention of the committee's own failings and missed opportunities to stop Neil Foden.
Wasn't Dewi Jones, the cabinet member for Education, originally part of
the investigation? Did he excuse himself..?
This report was intended to be published in 2025, but had to be delayed because the investigating team had not included the voice of the child...
The children's voice... It is of high concern that the council
did not utilise the recognised 'provider' due to the provider having
fears that the council's 'remit' did not go far enough.
Ignoring the concerns of the independent provider, cyngor Gwynedd chose instead to appoint Dr Ceryl Teleri Davies, a former senior officer within the council's SS department - on the initial remit that others had considered insufficient.
Only 57 pupils were engaged... Her 'Pupil Voice Report' can be found in appendix 7 here - https://democracy.gwynedd.llyw.cymru//documents/s50889/Appendices.pdf
The schools chosen by the council for the sample were -
Davies includes four bite sized quotes from the children...
Why Ysgol Friars, and Ysgol Dyffryn Nantlle (the main schools where Foden was found abusing) were not included is not known...
The most vulnerable children... Ysgol Pendalar in Caernarfon is a special school yet Davies does not give any detail of how these children were engaged with. There is no information to what measures are in place for ALN/disabled or how they are kept safe from predators and abuse...
What of the 21% of children in mainstream schools with ALN? From reading the report there is no mention of how these pupils are engaged with in an appropriate manner and how their understanding is checked. How are pupils with speech and language and other communication issues supported in all of this?
Protect the higher pay-grades... A reminder that everyone knew Neil Foden was an abusive bully... Safeguarding arrangements did not fail - the toxic culture within schools and the council protected him from censure.
The Ffordd Gwynedd way... The Safeguarding Arrangements report is not comprehensive and like many of the documents written
by cyngor Gwynedd appears to be yet another exercise in tick boxing and
marking the officers homework...
The report is to be presented to the Education and Economy Scrutiny committee on the 14th, July, 2026. The webcast of the meeting will be found here - https://gwynedd.public-i.tv/core/portal/webcast_interactive/1109262
Something is very wrong within Gwynedd council - and its schools...
Cyngor Gwynedd's care scrutiny committee meet on Thursday, 29th
January, 2026. The agenda pack for the meeting can be found here - https://democracy.gwynedd.llyw.cymru//ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=394&MId=5671
The meeting will discuss the 'Keeping Families Together Strategy' co-authored by Sharron Williams Carter, the interim head of children's SS and Gwenan Medi Hughes, Sue Layton and Caren Brown.
A report from the Youth Justice Service, authored by Stephen Wood, will be presented.
Eighteen
months ago, senior officers of the YJS were criticised by HM
Inspectorate of Probation. The link to their report shows 'Page not
found' but an archived version can be found here -
An excerpt from the HMIP report – Assessment work to identify and
analyse risks to the child’s safety and wellbeing was much weaker.
Practitioners, while generally accessing information well, did not use
the information from other agencies regularly. We identified failures to
appropriately consider or respond to exploitation concerns and suggest
this is an area that requires additional training, understanding and
focus by the service. Inspectors did not agree with almost half of the
risk classifications made by case managers.
In June, 2024,
the same time as the HMIP report, cyngor Gwynedd's cabinet met to
discuss the 'Performance Report for Children and Supporting Families'
presented by the former cabinet member for children, Elin Walker-Jones. Main discussion points were the Small Group Homes scheme and the Autism
Plan. The agenda pack can be found here - https://democracy.gwynedd.llyw.cymru//documents/g5221/Public%20reports%20pack%2011th-Jun-2024%2013.00%20The%20Cabinet.pdf?T=10
Aled Gibbard answered questions of the cabinet members. Councillors asked what happens when these
children reach the age of 18. Gibbard replied that the council no longer
have a responsibilty for these children.
In his latest report ,16+ Team (Leaving Care), the interim head of SS now states - While the young person is under 18, they are treated as children in care. When they turn eighteen they become Care Leavers and are the responsibility of the local authority until they are 25 years old.
If true, this change of policy and alignment with lawis to be welcomedbut exactly what support will be given to care leavers?
In
recent meetings, the council has scrutinised safeguarding practices and
repeatedly emphasised the importance of listening to the child’s voice.
There have been assurances that this will be the number one priority
through not only the SS departments, but all council departments
Is it not of concern then that the 16+ service report states - 5. Consultation 5.1 We have not consulted with service users for the purposes of this report.
It is not just the' voice of the child' that is missing... But the child... They can not all be refugees and even if they were - where are they?
Gibbard also relies on the Population Needs Assessment. Some people remember the meeting of the care scrutiny committee on the 3rd February, 2022, which accepted the document. Gwynedd's contribution to the North Wales Population Needs Assessment was ...incomplete.
Dafydd Meurig presented the document and concerns
were raised that few people were responding with requests for
information – surveys etc and that not all data was positive to the services... The document along with the agenda pack for 2022 can be found here - https://democracy.gwynedd.llyw.cymru/documents/g4539/Public%20reports%20pack%2003rd-Feb-2022%2010.30%20Care%20Scrutiny%20Committee.pdf?T=10
If officers were not blaming residents they were blaming covid. The data is worthless but councillors thanked the officers for their honesty and voted to accept the document anyway. Of the councillors present -
Councillor Eryl Jones-Williams (Chair) Councillor Angela Russell (Vice-chair) Councillors: Menna Baines, Beca Brown, Anwen J. Davies, Alan Jones Evans, Richard Medwyn Hughes, Gareth Tudor Morris Jones, Linda Ann Jones, Olaf Cai Larsen, Linda Morgan, Beth Lawton and Dafydd Owen.
Only one voted against with another abstaining. The rest voted it through.
The Article 4 directive was passed at the Cabinet meeting of cyngor Gwynedd council on the 16th July, 2024. Two members were absent from this important meeting. Apologies were received from the deputy leader of the council, Nia Jeffreys and the cabinet member for housing, Craig ab Iago.
The meeting was webcast and can be found here - https://gwynedd.public-i.tv/core/portal/webcast_interactive/895758 As often happens, the translated feed is not yet working...
The Education and Economy Scrutiny Committee met on Thursday, 18th July, 2024. Four councillors did not turn up and a co-opted member was also absent.
Olaf Cai Larsen was elected as the new chair. A vice chair was not elected as no-one wanted the position. One councillor was proposed but he point blank refused and so the matter was deferred until the next meeting.
Overview and scrutiny is important in holding Council's policy makers to account and scrutiny committees are fundamental to the
functioning of a healthy democracy. Some councillors have raised concerns that there is no proper scrutiny in Gwynedd and one has even compared it to a 'children's parliament'.
The chair and vice chair of scrutiny committees are allowed access to the Scrutiny Forum. The forum is where the real power lies and determines what is and what is not to be scrutinised at the committees. This forum should be open to the public to ensure propriety.
First up on the agenda was the GwE Annual Report 2023-2024, presented by its
managing director, Arwyn Thomas. GwE is to come to an end in March, 2025
and this will be its last report in its present form. GwE is a school
improvement service for the whole of North Wales but this year their
meetings have focussed more on job losses than any school improvements.
GwE
never really recovered from the 'hotdesking' and inflated travel
expenses scandal that came to light in 2020. It has never been explained
why the former CEO did not action when the council's internal audit
flagged - "To this end, Internal Audit cannot provide assurance that value for
money has been taken into account when changing work locations." https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-53661995
Next up was the Middle Tier Review. This report comes about in part because - Recent
publications including Estyn reports, PISA and the personalised
assessments national report, have identified a need to improve the
quality of learning and outcomes within and across schools, and the
consistency of this across Wales for ALL learners...
The report appears to lay the blame for this on poverty which does not
explain those children who are failing whose parents are not in
poverty.
The report goes on to ask - How well are we doing? How do we know? How can we improve? To
achieve this, school leaders and practitioners should work in
partnership with each other and their LA within an open, trusting
environment. So school leaders, practioners and the culture is the problem - not poverty.
Schools
in Gwynedd have suffered from many issues over the years from bullying, harassment and assault. The problems have not been dealt with and the
Neil Foden case only confirms that pupils (and teachers) are not safe...
A reminder that the Education and Economy Scrutiny Committee failed to hold Neil Foden to account after the school meals debacle and also took no action when the video appearing to show Foden grabbing a pupil by the scruff of the neck appeared online.
A report, authored by Llion Williams and titled Safeguarding Arrangements in Schools was presented. The report can be found in the meetings agenda pack here - https://democracy.gwynedd.llyw.cymru//documents/g5168/Public%20reports%20pack%2018th-Jul-2024%2010.30%20Education%20and%20Economy%20Scrutiny%20Committee.pdf?T=10
As
is to be expected after the Foden case arrangements have been
updated. But they appear to focus on safeguarding children from their
parents and it appears that little has been done to advise what happens
if a senior teacher and/or the designated officer responsible for safeguarding is the one being
abusive.
One councillor pointed out that the school's last Estyn
report stated that safeguarding procedures were robust - when they were
obviously not. Did Neil Foden assist Estyn in this report? To an outsider, Foden was able to abuse with
impunity and there is nothing in this report that suggests those in a
position of authority will not be able to abuse again.
The BBC did report on this meeting but its focus was on matters relating to Foden - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cl4ym5kl85eo The council's current head of education, Gwern ap Rhisiart, told the
education and economy scrutiny committee that safeguarding was a
"priority" for the department.
But Sharon Roberts, representing Arfon's parents and governors on the committee was more critical - "Accept how little confidence there is out there among parents I speak to, everyone has been shocked by what has happened."
Gwynedd and Eryri Sustainable Visitor Economy Plan 2035 was discussed. Cllr Gwynfor Owenmentioned
that the national park agency do not engage with the county council and
a plea was made to consult with councillors.
It was perceived that the
report deals with growth rather than a sustainable visitor economy. The
officer explained that they wanted to extend the tourist season rather than the peak in summer. There was little data to the impact on local jobs and the
the language.
The committee complained of the negative effects of tourism and
that too many people were visiting the area, causing traffic jams and that locals were not able to get to the beach. Seasonal jobs were not
great for those with families and mortgages and that all year round jobs were needed for peoples security. It was mentioned that many businesses were reliant on children...
This led to a trip down memory lane for some who talked of their own childhood experiences working for local businesses. It was pointed out that laws have since been introduced because of the exploitation of children by bosses...
In stark contrast to the Cabinet passing Article 4, one councillor talked of second homes bringing benefits to the local economy and called for a debate to dispel myths on the issue. He contended that these homes relied on local traders, such as plumbers and electricians who in the main spoke the language and that it was a win win.
Many agreed that more research was needed and one commented that the report goes in every direction but the right direction. Councillors were not happy with the report but they voted to pass it anyway...
