With regard to the previous post, the Corporate Director of Cyngor Gwynedd council SS departments, Morwena Edwards, has given her explanation of the statements made to the Care Scrutiny Committee by the CEO, Dilwyn Williams and the senior complaints manager, Dafydd Paul, in particular - bearing in mind the Ombudsman for Wales has denied instructing the council.
"The Ombudsman is correct in his replies to your queries that he did not explicitly request that Gwynedd Council contact you by telephone to offer and/or arrange these assessments."
Interesting wording - and they were anything but queries...
Morwena continues -
"However, the Ombudsman’s office was clear that they expected us to be pro–active in response to their findings that we provide these assessments.After obtaining legal advice, our interpretation of the Ombudsman’s recommendation led us to conclude that contacting you directly to offer you and your family the comprehensive assessment of your needs referred to above was the most appropriate course of action. This action was taken in good faith as part of our sincere effort to meet the terms of the Ombudsman’s recommendation.I wish to sincerely apologise for the confusion and distress that the subsequent telephone call to you on 14/11/19 caused, and I accept that we should have taken into account that you had previously requested that communication between your family and the Council should only be conducted via email.In response to your second point above,
I acknowledge that the quote from the transcript you provided of Mr Paul’s statement to the Care Scrutiny Committeeon 14/11/19 is what was conveyed to the Committee."
So did the senior complaints manager mislead Councillors of the Committee?
"However, I must disagree with your assertion that his statement was made deliberately to mislead the Committee in some way about how Gwynedd Council were intending to meet the Ombudsman’s recommendations contained in his report."
But, if the Ombudsman had given the council no such instruction why did the officer spend so much time telling Councillors that he had ?
"...the Ombudsman has judged this and wants us to go no matter what the wish
of the individual may be..."
"Mr Paul’s statement to the Committee is consistent with the prevailing interpretation of this specific recommendation from the Ombudsman by Gwynedd Council at that time. In order to meet the recommendation, we decided that all methods be explored in order to comprehensively assess your family’s needs."
'...consistent with the prevailing interpretation...' What. does. that. even. mean ?
Regardless - the Ombudsman has denied the words of Dafydd Paul -
"given them a
further challenge, to make sure that someone goes to see the family,
meet the family, ensure that they receive that assessement and that is
something that we have now arranged with the adult
services, to go into that situation on the Ombudsman's behalf, despite
the fact that they have not expressed a wish to receive the service, our
usual ethos involves intervention but only if the person invites us in
and wishes for us to intervene in this way,
the Ombudsman has judged this and wants us to go no matter what the wish
of the individual may be, so that is now our response to that challenge
provided by the Ombudsman." (translated)
Morwena Edwards continues -
"The action of being proactive in offering you and your family these assessments was seen as vital to meeting the Ombudsman’s directions, and was interpreted as being a requirement implicitly arising from that recommendation."
There is that word 'interpretation' again. Anyway the recommendation referred to has been ignored since 2010, and again in 2017. Two social worker's were assigned to carry out that task in 2018, alongside another Ombudsman's recommendation. After completing one piece of work - badly - they did not return as they had said they would.
The Ombudsman has called the Director's thinking as 'illogical' in a past investigation. What could be said now ?
Something is seriously wrong within Gwynedd council.
