The meeting passed a motion raised by councillor Beca Brown.
The #NotMyShame motion was in response to the actions of paedophile headteacher, Neil Foden. Brown
was the former cabinet member for Education, who
resigned last year in protest at the council leader's handling of the
matter and was vocal in calling for a full public inquiry...
Brown mentioned that child abuse can happen '...more often than not in their own homes.' Gwynedd has a long history of child abuse and many of the abusers have been those in a position of trust. A reminder that cyngor Gwynedd has recently reported an increase in allegations against those in a position of trust.
But what happens when someone blows the whistle? In
2019, the then head of education, Garem Jackson, was contacted by a
teacher with concerns of Foden's closeness to children. After seeking advice from a safeguarding officer, Jackson simply
had a chat with Foden about his behaviour and also outed the
whistleblower to him.
A reminder that the council sacked a social worker who blew the whistle on the last child sexual abuse scandal.
A recent survey of Gwynedd staff revealed many would NOT blow the whistle on wrongdoing - including sexual abuse. Fear of retribution...? Is this the 'culture' that the executive officers say must change...? It has never been explained what the culture was that needed to change...
There were other opportunities to stop Foden. Were claims of undeserved examination passes at Ysgol Friars investigated? Judgements
from Employment Tribunals are published online and it is presumed that
senior officers would have knowledge of the case as well as the school
governors.
Then there was a ruling against Foden for unprofessional conduct... There was also the video of Foden allegedly showing him grabbing a pupil by the scruff of the neck. What action did Garem Jackson and the school governors at Ysgol Dyffryn Nantlle take?
Councillors
of Gwynedd's Education and Economy Scrutiny committee did raise this
issue at one meeting but Jackson refused to answer though he did promise
the committee an update. (Gwynedd officers are sometimes reluctant to give information within public meetings and some councillors are given more details afterwards)
So were committee members informed? What actions did members and the then cabinet member for Education take? The committee is currently investigating Foden and their report should be completed soon.
Many
will find it ... distasteful that the Not My Shame campaign flag is to
be flown above the heads of a council who could and should have stopped
Foden years ago.
Councillors could be asking for the Woods report to be published. They could also ask for the Canolfan Brynffynnon reports.
The webcast of the meeting can be found here - https://gwynedd.public-i.tv/core/portal/webcast_interactive/981083
Why wasn't Neil Foden stopped...? Cyngor Gwynedd council
Earlier this year, Gwynedd council's children and family department reported that complaints of a historic nature had been received dating back to 2013. No action was taken by social workers of the Arfon team. When the report was presented to the Care Scrutiny Committee not one councillor commented or even asked about their welfare. Shameful...
Controversy has plagued Gwynedd council ever since its creation in 1996 after the North Wales abuse scandal. Concerns about its councillors have been raised in Parliament, too. More recently, the Ombudsman for Wales has found them guilty of maladministration - on several occasions.
In 2014, the safeguarding team along with officers from the education department and North Wales police began an investigation into a complaint of alleged cruelty against children at Canolfan Brynffynnon in Y Felinheli. The pupil referral unit (PRU) catered for children with behavourial issues and others who did not cope well in mainstream schools including those with disabilities. Two members of staff were arrested and suspended by the council.
It is believed that a few weeks later, a third member of staff was suspended after a separate incident was reported. It is claimed this staff member was interviewed by police who decided there was no case to answer.
The initial allegation of cruelty has always been disputed and the case was dropped in 2016 after the Criminal Prosecution Service
received new information from the police. This 'new information' has never
been made public.
This case is troubling on many levels. There has been speculation asking if the investigating officers followed law and official procedures when interviewing the children? Or did the investigation begin from a malicious allegation and then evidence gathered to support the initial complaint?
Wasn't Liz Saville Roberts, now MP for Dwyfor Meirionnydd, the Cabinet member for Education at this time? Perhaps she could throw some light on this case and put an end to the speculation?
Over £800,000 was paid to NWP by the council and then there is the cost of those suspended on full pay, plus the cost to the council conducting their own investigation(s) into the matter. A reminder that Gwynedd council have a history of interference in investigations and writing reports in spite of the evidence.
Did the actions of the safeguarding team in 2014 make them reluctant to
take on Neil Foden? Or, as some have suggested, was he protected
because of his paygrade?
The Foden case is a can of worms for senior officers within safeguarding, education and NWP. It is no surprise that senior officers wish for a review of safeguarding only - which will be so limited that it will be worthless.
Six months before Foden's arrest, Geraint Owen, executive of the council and councillor
Dyfrig Siencyn, leader of the council presented the Ffordd Gwynedd Plan
to the Cabinet. It talked of a change of culture and mindset within the
council - …This is all rooted in a change of culture, behaviours and mind-set
and its aim of realising the ambition across all parts of the Council’s
activities is acknowledged as a substantial challenge and one which
requires a comprehensive programme of support… Also - Acting on the basis of evidence, rather than on the basis of what
appears to be logical, is one of the cornerstones of the “way of
working”and here there is an important function to ensure that managers
and their teams use the information and data available to its full
potential.
The executive officers and many senior officers have worked for the council for 20 years plus. Are they responsible for the culture and mindset? To outsiders, the culture and mindset could be read as nepotism, bullying and collusion in cover up of bad decision making and even worse behaviours.
Then there is the Education Workplace Council investigation which found Foden guilty of unacceptable professional conduct. This alone should have been the end of him. What action, if any, was taken by the council and school governors at Ysgol Friars?
In early, 2022, a video was released online showing Foden appearing to grab a pupil by the scruff of the neck at Ysgol Dyffryn Nantlle, in Penygroes. What action, if any, was taken by the council and school governors at Dyffryn Nantlle?
This video was discussed by the Education and Economy Committee but no action appeared to have been taken by the then head of education, Garem Jackson,, nor the former Cabinet member for Education, Cemlyn Williams, at that time. It is believed that Elin Walker Jones, now Cabinet member for children was a member of this committee. Her knowledge of what the council knew of Neil Foden and the discussions that took place would be invaluable.
Something is so very, very wrong within Gwynedd council...
Whose job is it to keep children in Gwynedd safe from predators like Neil Foden?
While Jackson is holed up at home refusing to answer the door to reporters - who is asking questions of the school governors at Ysgol Friars? - https://www.ysgolfriars.cymru/en/the-governing-body
and Ysgol Dyffryn Nantlle? - https://www.ysgoldyffrynnantlle.cymru/en/governors/whos-who
And what of the cyngor Gwynedd safeguarding team...?
The Senior Manager Safeguarding and Quality at Cyngor Gwynedd Counci is Dafydd Paul -
'Senior manager within statutory Children Services with responsibility in
areas of child protection (safeguarding), adult protection, corporate
safeguarding and quality assurance. Manager of the Safeguarding and
Quality Unit. Internal coach, coach supervisor and trainer in corporate
programmes. AcademyWales associate in areas of executive coaching,
facilitation and Managing Change training programme.'
Dafydd Paul and Bruce Thornton created the Risk Model -
The Risk Model continues to be developed. As it is
introduced in ever increasing numbers of Authorities, Bruce modifies and
extends the tools and training products. Dafydd has incorporated the
Risk Model into a new innovation developed by Children Services in
Gwynedd called Effective Child Protection.
About the project -
Has the Risk Model failed..? All models, policies and procedures are heavily reliant on
the honesty, integrity and professional judgement of those in senior positions...
In June, 2023, feedback from a safeguarding review by Care Inspectorate Wales was presented to the Care Scrutiny Committee. It was found that -
Children in Gwynedd benefit from agencies sharing information effectively, and this is supported by a clear and understood model of practice. It was considered that children in Gwynedd are safeguarded effectively... https://democracy.gwynedd.llyw.cymru/documents/s38246/Feedback%20from%20Safeguarding%20Review%20by%20Care%20Inspectorate%20Wales.pdf
But the council do acknowledge - However, two examples were seen where external agencies had not shared information with children’s services in a timely manner.
In typical Ffordd Gwynedd way, Marian Parry Hughes, Head of Children and Family SS does not name the external agencies in her report.
Also - 2.8 It was noted that North Wales Police’s policy is not to attend review child protection conferences. It was recognised that they provide a report to the meetings, but it was flet (sic) that this was a failure to participate in the discussion in relation to whether the child remained at risk of significant harm
One wonders if the Care Inspectorate Wales review was the reason for the Director of SS, delaying publication of the 2022/23 Annual Complaints Handling report? The CIW may have probed deeper if they had known about the historic complaints reported...
The report can be found here - https://democracy.gwynedd.llyw.cymru//documents/g4975/Public%20reports%20pack%2011th-Apr-2024%2010.30%20Care%20Scrutiny%20Committee.pdf?T=10
A reminder that this is the first SS Annual Complaints Handling report to go before the Care Scrutiny Committee since 2019 after which Dafydd Paul was called out for misleading councillors. No proper scrutiny for five years...
“A body of men holding themselves accountable to nobody ought not to be trusted by anybody.”
Thomas Paine
Something is so very wrong within Gwynedd council...
Neil Foden, has been found guilty of sexual offences against children. The Headmaster of Ysgol Friars in Bangor, Gwynedd was also Strategic Head at Ysgol Dyffryn Nantlle, in Penygroes. It is presumed that Foden's considerable salary has still been paid by Gwynedd council since his arrest in September, last year.
Could Foden have been stopped...?
The trial heard evidence from Garem Jackson, former Head of Education at cyngor Gwynedd, that concerns were raised about Foden in 2019. The concerns raised by another senior teacher were not acted upon and instead Garem Jackson was advised to have a chat with Foden about the issues raised. Jackson outed the whistleblower to Foden during the subsequent telephone conversation. https://www.itv.com/news/wales/2024-04-30/authorities-failed-to-investigate-former-accused-headteacher-over-concerns
Garem Jackson was advised by (presumably?) the senior safeguarding officer for children at Gwynedd council and while Jackson made no record of the concerns raised, surely this safeguarding officer would have done...?
The children's safeguarding officer wears many hats at the council. For several years, he has held the position of senior safeguarding and quality officer for children's SS and is also the department's senior complaints officer. The two roles are not compatible and concerns have been raised with regard to his 'independence' during complaint investigations.
He is also a registered social worker, the register until recently showing 'Gwynedd' to be this officer's 'county of work address/county of study'. For some reason this is now not the case and instead the register states 'not applicable' under this heading.
Foden - How could this happen? "You were a powerful figure, you thought you could just do as you liked," Judge Rowlands added. He
said it was worrying that when concerns were first raised to Gwynedd
county council about Foden in 2019 by a senior member of staff, "they
were dismissed out of hand, no investigation took place, no note was
taken of what was said or done, and now we know you continued to
offend". https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ce43313v37eo
The culture of cover up by senior officers at Gwynedd council has been well documented in previous posts. Both
Garem Jackson and the senior safeguarding officer have refused to
answer questions from scrutiny members in the past - along with the
former cabinet member for children. How has this been allowed?
People who do speak out have been smeared by senior officers and ignored by local councillors. From cabinet members through to scrutiny committee members - complicit in the toxic culture that has been allowed to continue to cover for incompetence and protect reputational damage...
What happens next...? A council spokeswoman said - Due to the serious nature of the case, arrangements are being made
to carry out an independent review in accordance with national Child
Practice Review guidelines. The exact form of the review is currently being determined.
With cyngor Gwynedd being found, by the Ombudsman for Wales, to have interfered in a past 'independent' investigation and other independent investigations delayed for years, how can the public have confidence that any review into such serious matters will be any different? Will cyngor Gwynedd engage in an open, honest and transparent manner...?
Better a proper public inquiry with the power to call witnesses... Those witnesses should include the former CEO, Dilwyn Williams and the former Director of SS, Morwena Edwards. Both were in post in 2019 with ultimate responsibility for the actions of officers.
A reminder that both left the council just as the final investigation report into the two teachers suspended for 9 years was to be released. There has still been no official statement from the council nor details of the cost to the public purse. This case would also have involved the safeguarding officers and the former Head of Education...
Questions also need to be asked of the school Governors. Did they not notice Foden's behaviour? Were concerns raised with them...?
And what of the two historic complaints that were recently revealed in the delayed 2022/23 SS complaint handling report...?
Something is so very, very wrong within Gwynedd council...
In November, 2021, Neil Foden, headteacher at Ysgol Dyffryn Nantlle in Penygroes wrote to parents informing that any child with a debt of 2p would be refused school meals. This caused a national furore with interventions from Marcus Rashford and blogger Simon Harris (men behaving dadly)
The headteacher blamed the decision on his council bosses who he claims 'threw him under a bus' - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-59341464 "All I did was to pass on the authority's message to parents."
Gwynedd Council blamed "lack of clarity" from its education department on school food debt policy - https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/education/council-apologises-school-meal-debt-22153658
Councillors of Gwynedd's Education and Economy Scrutiny Committee challenged the Head of Education, Garem Jackson, for an explanation. He did not provide one but promised an update for the next meeting.
Two months later, a video was posted online that appears to show Neil Foden grabbing a pupil by the scruff of the neck - https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/education/head-teacher-filmed-appearing-grab-22967578
At the next scrutiny meeting, Mr Jackson failed to answer the committees previous concerns and was also unwilling to respond to the latest incident. Once again, promising to get the full facts and return with an update for councillors. There is no record of Mr Jackson updating the committee on either incident...
Mr Foden has a history of controversy. In 2018, a Biology teacher was awarded £8,000 compensation after an 'outrageous' suspension by the Ysgol Friars headteacher - The tribunal was convinced Mr Foden had at one stage been “looking for an excuse to make things difficult for the claimant”. https://www.dailypost.co.uk/news/biology-teacher-awarded-8000-compensation-14867550
Also - “We developed a particular view about the evidence given by Mr Foden
which undermined his credibility and/or reliability as a witness.” https://www.dailypost.co.uk/news/north-wales-news/autocratic-gwynedd-headmaster-included-malpractice-14853841 How is this not perjury?
In 2020, he was found guilty of unacceptable professional conduct by the Education Workforce Council. It was proved that Mr Foden treated a third teacher unfairly when
providing a reference in 2016 in which he said he was facing an
allegation of malpractice when, in fact, the teacher had been cleared. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-54300055
The panel heard evidence that included - "I
felt victimised by Neil Foden due to the way he operated. You were
either in his gang or you were not," person D told the panel. He
claimed he was never interviewed by school governors and that Mr
Foden's daughter had investigated the allegations against him. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-51710557
The teacher claimed Mr Foden was looking to "pressurise" him after he
made whistleblowing complaints over erroneous submissions of exam
results by his department boss. Person D said he made the whistleblowing complaints in 2014 because
pupils had been "awarded an exam pass" and he was initially concerned it
was an "administrative error".
However, he said the evidence had been moved for the five pupils concerned. "The evidence had been removed from a computer file. It had taken a year and a quarter for the exam board to be told." Person D said he and two other concerned teachers were not interviewed about the exam concerns until "four to six months later". https://www.dailypost.co.uk/news/north-wales-news/headmaster-victimised-teacher-who-blew-17850450
The delay in interviewing the teachers will affect any legal process as there is a very short window to lodge complaints and/or take legal action. After one year, it is presumed that the exam board would dismiss any concerns as out of time... Mr Foden is also Head of Ysgol Friars in Bangor.
Perhaps the scrutiny committee could remind the Head of Education of his promise to report on the incidents and also ask for an update on the two teachers believed to have been suspended on full pay for 9 years...
In 2014, the council's safeguarding team began an investigation alongside north
wales police.. It did not go well. In 2018, the CPS threw out the case
after they did a deep dive of the 'evidence'.
A spokesman for the council said - "This process concluded with the CPS deciding not to proceed with any
prosecutions. The council is currently carrying out its own subsequent
internal investigation into the matter and as a result the individuals
remain suspended from their posts.” https://web.archive.org/web/20180729072902/https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/welsh-councils-paid-9m-staff-14876849
Gwynedd council also paid over £800,000 of public money to north wales police. For what...? The costs of this case, including the legal fees, must be approaching 2 million pounds - if not more...
An FOI seeking information on the matter was shut down by the
monitoring officer who simply ignored the request for an internal
review. The next step in the legal process - a complaint to the ICO - usually requires an internal review to have been undertaken. Regardless, the ICO can only 'advise' the council to release information. Gwynedd council have ignored the 'advice' of the ICO in the past...
Questions to the integrity and professionalism of the safeguarding team remain. The senior safeguarding officer for Gwynedd has not been seen at a council meeting since 2019 when he was called out for deceiving the care scrutiny committee in another case.
Something is so very wrong within Gwynedd council...
In 2018, the BBC reported that staff at Ysgol Dyffryn Nantlle in Penygroes, had contacted their Trade Unions - NASUWT, NEU and UCAC with concerns about how the school was being run. The statement from Gwynedd council insisting good progress was being made held no water with the staff who wanted to discuss their concerns with an 'independent' party.
The joint letter from the unions repeated previous concerns teaching staff had with the school's management. Ysgol Dyffryn Nantlle was placed in special measures in 2015 which lasted until 2017 after 'robust' improvements had been made.
The BBC article from the 18th May, 2018 with the headline 'staff issue strike ballot threat' can be found here -https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-north-west-wales-44165753
Sadly, issues with the school continue. A recent article published on the 7th October, 2020, by the Local Democracy reporter, Gareth Wyn-Williams, reports on an internal review commissioned by Cyngor Gwynedd
council and compiled in February.
From the Daily Post article headlined - Staff morale 'extremely low' at North Wales secondary school, damning report finds -
Despite an acceptance that general pupil behaviour had improved, the
report revealed that some staff remained negative about "concerning"
aspects relating to a "small core."
With staff confidence in the
leadership of the headteacher "needing to be restored," it reported
staff openly admitting they were "afraid of some pupils" with some
feeling that Ysgol Dyffryn Nantlle was "sometimes used as a dumping
ground for troublesome pupils from other schools".
Among
findings was that governors "did not have a firm grasp" of how the
school was operating, with a danger of the body becoming "factionalised"
into those who supported the headteacher and those who didn't, while
also being "slow to act" on performance issues.
Many staff including the Head have been off sick for long absences which has simply added to the many problems the school has faced.
Whilst the school, the governors, the council, the GwE, tom cobley and all scramble to protect their own reputations, the well being of the children and their education for their futures appear to be last on the list of priorities.
Caernarfon has been an area of deprivation since forever. Millions of pounds has been thrown at the area by UK government(s), the Welsh Assembly and the European Union over the years but the people remain poor. Poor quality housing and high rents exacerbate the issues. In the 80's, heroin, poor wages and unemployment were the problem. Now it is cocaine, poor wages and unemployment..
The local children in the area suffer the consequences that such deprivation has on the mental health of their parents and the local communities yet the council pull youth clubs and support services and local businesses either close or reallocate. A vicious cycle over and over...
A 2018 FOI request revealed that 21% of the pupils at the school were recognised as having Additional Learning Needs. If the Head and staff are off sick what happens then ? How are these children being supported ?
Pupil Referral Units (PRU's) were until 2013 held in separate buildings away from school premises, now they are run on site within the schools. The PRU's in Gwynedd were highly regarded but closed due to the cuts imposed by the council. Have the closures lead to the dumping of these children back into schools who can not cope to the detriment of all ?
The figures for those recognised with ALN are even higher in other schools in Gwynedd.
ADYaCH Behaviour Support link for those who have an interest -
The Behaviour Support Service seeks a positive change in the behaviour
of young people who experience behavioural, emotional and social
development difficulties. The aim is to improve behaviour and reduce the
risk of exclusion from school.